Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner James F. Davis with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Buie 134(h). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on October 28, 1970. The plaintiff filed exceptions to the commissioner’s opinion with respect to the rail salvage issue and the vacation pay accrual issue. The defendant filed exceptions to the commissioner’s opinion regarding the issues of donated property depreciation, casualty loss, welded rail, protective facilities, and the Mexican tax…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Detroit Edison Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Howard B. Quinn and Charlotte J. Quinn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bankers Trust New York Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Nissho Iwai Am. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.