Legal Opinion

Martino v. McDonald's System, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 6, 1985No. 75 C 3455, 77 C 98Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

These cases were originally filed to challenge, as a per se illegal tie-in contrary to Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, McDonald’s contractual requirement that franchisees must buy and use Coca-Cola as its only sugar-sweetened cola beverage. The standard franchise agreement restricts franchisee purchases to “approved menu items” and only Coca-Cola has been designated as an approved sugar-sweetened cola.

Mindful of developing case law, plaintiffs later amended their complaint to allege that the practice was, alternatively, an unreasonable…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API