Martino v. McDonald's System, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
These cases were originally filed to challenge, as a per se illegal tie-in contrary to Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, McDonald’s contractual requirement that franchisees must buy and use Coca-Cola as its only sugar-sweetened cola beverage. The standard franchise agreement restricts franchisee purchases to “approved menu items” and only Coca-Cola has been designated as an approved sugar-sweetened cola.
Mindful of developing case law, plaintiffs later amended their complaint to allege that the practice was, alternatively, an unreasonable…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.