Legal Opinion

State v. Brandimart

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1986No. 10841; POLICE REPORT NO. C-19703PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAK.ATSUK.I. J

The State appeals the order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress and the order denying the State’s motion for reconsideration. The dispositive issue is whether the thirty (30) day requirement for filing a notice of appeal is tolled by the State’s motion for reconsideration. We answer in the negative.

1

Defendant-appellee Michael P. Brandimart was arrested and charged with committing the offense of Promoting Detrimental Drugs in the Second Degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1248 (1976). Defendant filed a motion to suppress…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ErwinHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. OrtizHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. AllenHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BohannonHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Grattafiori v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. OshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. SwaffordHawaii Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API