Legal Opinion
State v. Morales
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 2015No. 20140407PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Edward Morales appeals from a judgment entered upon a conditional guilty plea to causing death while operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the results of a war-rantless blood-alcohol test. Morales argues there was not sufficient evidence to support the district court’s decision that exigent circumstances permitted the war-rantless blood-alcohol test and N.D.C.C. §§ 39-20-01 and 39-20-03 are unconstitutional. We conclude the warrantless blood-alcohol test was ■ authorized under the exigent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Milks v. Iowa Oto-Head & Neck Specialists, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Bailey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- State v. ChatmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Morales v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. GardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.