Anderson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This appeal is initiated by defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (St. Paul) from a trial court order sustaining plaintiff Mary Anderson’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The issue involved is whether policy language is ambiguous and susceptible of allowing a consortium claim in addition to payment of maximum “each person” amounts. The judgment is affirmed.

On April 4, 1989, Mary Anderson filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment, seeking a ruling from the court determining that the policy of automobile insurance issued by St. Paul was ambiguous and provided additional…