Legal Opinion

Mattox v. City of Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1982No. 2085PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The City of Philadelphia (hereinafter “City”) appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which denied the City’s motions for a judgment n.o.v. or a new trial and which entered judgment in favor of Andrew Mattox (hereinafter “Appellee”) in the amount of two hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($220,000) plus interest as provided in Pa.R.C.P. 238. We affirm.

Our scope of review in such cases is clearly settled. In reviewing a motion for a judgment n.o.v., we must consider the evidence most favorable to the verdict winner and all reasonable inferences…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Graham v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Lokay v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Kearns v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Wainauskis v. Howard Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Jonnet Development Corp. v. Dietrich Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API