Legal Opinion

ROEDEL-HANSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Environamics Corp.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 29, 2003No. 02-C-0516Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Roedel-Hanson and Associates, Inc. (“RDM”), a Wisconsin corporation whose principal place of business is Wisconsin, brings this diversity action against Environamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation whose principal place of business is New Hampshire, alleging that defendant violated § 135.045 of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Act, Wis. Stat. § 135.045. Plaintiff contracted with defendant to distribute defendant’s products (pumps and seals) in the Wisconsin and upper Michigan areas and alleges that defendant violated the statute when, after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Nlfc, Incorporated v. Devcom Mid-America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Allstate Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Sam Lakhia v. Menards, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. James KONTOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, William Brock, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API