Schmidt Et Ux. v. Fitzsimmons Et Ux.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
This is a suit for a declaratory judgment determining whether the vendors or the vendees shall sustain the loss of escrowed funds embezzled by the escrow agent with whom they were deposited. The Schmidts, as plaintiffs, appeal from a decree dismissing their complaint and entering a decree in accordance with the prayer of the answer of the Fitzsimmonses, as defendants.
The case at bar has its origin in the sale of a parcel of farm land situated near Mt. Angel, Oregon, which was owned by the plaintiffs and purchased by the defendants, whom we shall hereinafter respectively refer to as the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lieb v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Angell v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Crum v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alderman v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. AventCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Ward Cook, Inc. v. DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Nebraska Hospital Ass'n Charitable, Scientific, & Educational Foundation v. C & J PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Alderman v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.