Legal Opinion
Hux v. Raben
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 31, 1966No. Gen. 65-106PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoldenhersh, P. J.
Defendants appeal from the decree of the Circuit Court of Hamilton County ordering the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate.
Plaintiff, John D. Hux, is the assignee of an option to purchase the real estate involved in this litigation. On April 17, 1964, defendants, husband and wife, signed a printed form headed “Option to Purchase Real Estate.” The instrument recites the receipt by defendants of the sum of $1,000, in consideration of which, R. L. Merrick, described as purchaser, his heirs and assigns, are given “the exclusive right to purchase, upon the terms and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Olson v. ForsbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Cefalu v. BreznikIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Rampke v. BeuhlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hux v. RabenIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Crane v. MullikenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Stender v. National Boulevard BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Santo v. SantoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Barry M. Dechtman, Inc. v. Sidpaul Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.