Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSH, Chief Justice.
Indiana’s tax statutes expressly authorize corporate taxpayers to deduct some foreign source dividend income when calculating Indiana adjusted gross income. But Caterpillar attempted to use that same deduction to increase its Indiana net operating losses available for carryover to other tax years. We hold that the plain meaning of the Indiana tax statutes disallows Caterpillar’s use of the foreign source dividend deduction outside of its legisla tively authorized context. We also hold that Caterpillar has not met its burden to show that disallowing the deduction…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Sloan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christopher Tiplick v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Indiana v. Sameer Girish ThakarIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Columbia Sportswear USA Corporation v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2015
- Merchandise Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2015