Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Philadelphia Gear Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1986No. 84-1972Published

1Dissent

Justice Marshall, with whom Justice Blackmun and Justice Rehnquist join,

dissenting.

There is considerable common sense backing the Court’s opinion. The standby letter of credit in this case differs considerably from the savings and checking accounts that come most readily to mind when one speaks of an insured deposit. Nevertheless, to reach this common-sense result, the Court must read qualifications into the statute that do not appear *441there. We recently recognized that even when the ingenuity of businessmen creates transactions and corporate forms that were perhaps not contemplated by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. American Perforating Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Allen v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-Corporate CapacityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API