Legal Opinion

Calalpa v. Dae Ryung Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 31, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CONLEY, P.J.A.D.

This appeal arises in the context of a workers’ compensation benefitted employee’s settled intentional wrong tort litigation against defendants, one of whom is unquestionably his employer and the other an apparent, but not dispositively determined, joint employer.2 The workers’ compensation carrier successfully obtained an order from the trial judge according it the benefit of the workers’ compensation lien pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-40 and, thus, directing that “plaintiff shall reimburse [the workers’ compensation carrier] its…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Primus v. Alfred Sanzari EnterprisesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  2. Richter v. Oakland Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  3. MARY RICHTER VS. OAKLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-0742-15, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. Mary Richter v. Oakland Board of Education (083273)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API