Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Salo

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1983No. 82-297PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Plaintiff appeals from 6m adverse judgment in the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, in this action to collect allegedly delinquent pension fund contributions from defendant. The District Court held that this action was barred by the doctrine of merger, the rule against splitting causes of action, and by this Court’s holding in em earlier case, as well as by a previous stipulated dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s attempt to enforce a Colorado judg ment involving the same alleged delinquency. We reverse the District Court and remand this cause, for consideration on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Baertsch v. County of Lewis and ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Matzen Construction, Inc. v. Leander Anderson Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Taggart v. RutledgeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1987
  5. Foianini v. BrintonWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API