Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shirey v. Trust Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1934No. 4683Published

1DissentLeyy, Justice

I feel constrained to construe the article of the statute in hand as supijorting the sufficiency of the abstract in-evidence, although the case of McGlothlin v. Coody (Tex. Civ. App.) 39 S.W.(2d) 133; Id. (Tex. Com. App.) 59 S.W.(2d) 819, would render such abstract, if applied to it, ineffective as a judgment lien.

It is firmly settled that a lien does not arise until the judgment is properly abstracted and indexed in the very provisions of the statute. Nye v. Moody, 70 Tex. 434, 8 S. W. 606; Pierce v. Wimberly, 78 Tex. 187, 14. S. W. 454; Evans v. Frisbie, 84 Tex. 341, 19 S. W. 510; and other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nye v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. McGlothlin v. CoodyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Red Cross Stock FarmTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Huggins v. JohnstonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cotton v. CoitTexas Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API