Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Coit

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1895No. 313PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from El Paso County. The opinion gives a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

—On the 17th day of April, 1880, Noyes Band, Frances W. Abney, Bichard W. Dorphley, P. B. Delaney, and Clarence B. Ehrman, parties of the first part, and Frank B. Cotton and his associates, parties of the second part, entered into an agreement, the substance of which, so far as necessary to the decision of this case, we state below. The associates of Frank B.'Cotton were George H. Cotton, Walter G. Cotton, E. B. Buckingham, and William P. Hunt, but they were not named in the instrument.

By the terms of the contract, all mineral lands theretofore or thereafter acquired…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. LOUISA & MARIA SETONSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Jenkins v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Hall v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Cavers v. Sioux Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Henyan v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Milmo National Bank v. CobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Ball v. CundiffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API