State v. MUYINGO

Defendant seeks reconsideration of our decision in State v. Muyingo, 225 Or App 156, 200 P3d 601 (2009) (Muyingo TV), arguing that this court misconstrued the record on appeal and, consequently, misunderstood one of his arguments. We conclude that, although one sentence in our prior opinion may have lacked clarity, we neither misconstrued the record nor misunderstood defendant’s argument. Accordingly, we allow reconsideration to clarify that single sentence, and otherwise adhere to our prior opinion in Muyingo TV.

Rather than recount the lengthy procedural posture of this case, which is…