Legal Opinion

State v. Sheikh-Nur

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 2017No. C130331CR, C130849CR, C131055CR, D125301M; A159054 (Control), A159055, A159056, A159057PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals judgments in four consolidated cases—Washington County Case Nos. C130331CR, C130849CR, C131055CR, and D125301M—in which he was convicted of multiple sexual offenses committed against a series of victims, and of other crimes. He raises two assignments of error on appeal, both of which pertain to Case No. C130849CR.1 In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court plainly erred in that case in failing to merge guilty verdicts for unlawful delivery of methamphetamine to a minor (Count 5) and unlawful delivery of methamphetamine (Count 6). The state concedes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. Valladares-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Powerex Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. FryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. HatchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. LovingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API