Legal Opinion
Gypsum Resources, LLC v. Masto
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 24, 2009No. 2:05-cv-583PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this case is property owner Gypsum Resources, LLC (“Gypsum”), a Nevada limited liability company. Defendants are Clark County District Attorney David Roger, the County of Clark (the “County”), the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Clark (the “Board”), (collectively, the “County Defendants”), and Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto. Plaintiff sued Defendants, asking the Court to declare Nevada Senate Bill No. 358 (“SB 358”) and Clark County Ordinance No. 2914 (“CCO 2914”) unconstitutional under the United States…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v. City of PowellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Gibbons Vs. Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Gypsum Resources LLC v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023