Fitzpatrick v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause. Verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, J.
This is an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries, received by the plaintiff at the defendant company’s glass works under the following circumstances : -The plaintiff’s father was an employe of the defendant company, and plaintiff (who was a boy twelve years of age) was accustomed to carry his father’s dinner to him at the company’s works. The evidence justifies the conclusion that this was done not only with the knowledge of, but by the permission of the company.
On the day upon which the plaintiff received his injuries, he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phillips v. Library Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Mathews v. BenselSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
3Cited by18 opinions
- Snare & Triest Co. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- DeRobertis v. RandazzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Stark County Agricultural Society v. BrennerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Lucas v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Furey v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.