Legal Opinion
Raj Singh v. Stephen Lipworth
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 5, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01610Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAJ SINGH, No. 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STEPHEN LIPWORTH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court previously granted Plaintiff leave 19 to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff 20 has now filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The Court now recommends the FAC be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Reusser v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.