Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Persson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1955No. Civ. 20211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for fraud and misrepresentation, defendant Mintz alone appeals.

Facts: Plaintiff purchased from defendant Florence Persson two pieces of real estate located in the city of Los Angeles, at 915-919 South Kingsley Drive, improved with eight and nine room houses respectively, and the furniture, fixtures and equipment located therein.

Plaintiff agreed to purchase all the property for $32,000. At the time the property was purchased it was leased to defendant Dorothy Newell. Defendant Paul…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. French v. Smith Booth Usher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. NastosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Blackburn v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API