Legal Opinion

Guiley v. Hammaker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1982No. 16-80-06434, CA 19884Published

1Opinion of the Court

640 P.2d 664 (1982)

55 Or.App. 921

Dale Cole GUILEY, by Wanona L. Guiley, His Guardian Ad Litem, Appellant,

v.

Ruth Margaret HAMMAKER, Respondent.

No. 16-80-06434; CA 19884.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 20, 1981.

Decided February 8, 1982.

Reconsideration Denied March 11, 1982.

Clinton D. Simpson, Eugene, argued cause for appellant. With him on briefs was Roy Dwyer, P.C., Eugene.

James C. Tait, Oregon City, argued cause for respondent. With him on brief were Nelson L. Walker and Hibbard, Caldwell, Canning, Bowerman & Schultz, Oregon City.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and ROBERTS and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Frohs v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Schiele v. Hobart Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API