Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Company v. Cosper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 19, 2023No. S23Q0625PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

317 Ga. 356

FINAL COPY S23Q0625. FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. COSPER. COLVIN, Justice. Although product-liability claims are generally subject to a ten- year statute of repose in Georgia, see OCGA § 51-1-11 (b) (2), the statute of repose does not apply to negligence claims “arising out of conduct which manifests a willful, reckless, or wanton disregard for life or property,” OCGA § 51-1-11 (c). The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has certified to this Court two questions regarding OCGA § 51-1-11 (c). The federal district court asks (1) whether, under OCGA § 51-1-11…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Center Chemical Co. v. ParziniSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. ChatmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. General Refractories Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WALTON ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  2. SMITH v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  3. NELSON v. STRICKLANDSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  4. WOODS v. BARNES (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  5. SMITH v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API