Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Company v. W.R. Grace And Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 5, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
218 F.3d 204 (2nd Cir. 2000)
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
W.R. GRACE AND COMPANY, AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Defendants,
ROYAL INDEMNITY CO., Defendant-Appellee,
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Docket Nos. 98-7492, 98-7582, 98-7584
August Term, 1999
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Argued September 1, 1999
Decided: July 05, 2000
This appeal involving four insurance companies -- Maryland Casualty Company and Continental Casualty Company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Winkelmann v. Excelsior InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Boule v. HuttonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- The Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024