Carrington v. Aquatic Co.

OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY

In this case, the Court of Appeals affirmed a determination by the Workers' Compensation Commission that Carnell Carrington was not entitled to temporary benefits for a total disability caused by kidney failure unrelated to his employment. Agreeing with the Commission and the Court of Appeals, we affirm.

*531 I.

The Commission's determinations of fact are conclusive and binding on appeal, and thus, we "construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing part[y] before the Commission," Jeffreys v. Uninsured Emp'r's Fund , 297 Va. 82 , 87, 823 S.E.2d…