Legal Opinion

Eppling v. Schultz Dining Programs

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 29, 1994No. Record No. 0576-93-3PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the dis-positive question is whether an employee’s termination from employer procured selective employment permanently bars the employee from having her workers’ compensation benefits reinstated, when the reason for her termination was excessive absenteeism caused by non-work-related health problems. We find that the commission erred in permanently terminating Irma Eppling’s workers’ compensation benefits. The commission appears to have reached this erroneous result by misapplying our decision in Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Furniture Co. v. DoaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  4. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Marval Poultry Co., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Artis v. Ottenberg's Bakers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. Potomac Edison Co. of Virginia, Inc. v. CashCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  3. Leadbetter, Inc. v. PenkalskiCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  4. Food Lion, Inc. v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  5. Montalbano v. Richmond Ford, LLCCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API