Legal Opinion

Darovec Marketing Group, Inc. v. Bio-Genics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 27, 2000No. 98 C 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiffs Daro-vec Marketing Group (“DMG”), Joseph Darovec (“Darovec”) and Heather Harrington (“Harrington”) have filed a fourth amended complaint alleging that: Bio-Genics, Inc., d/b/a/ E'ola International (“E'ola”) and Fred Rogers (“Rogers”) defamed plaintiffs when they published an “Official Memorandum” (“the memorandum”) to E'ola distributors (Counts I and II); defendant Bert Tuck (“Tuck”) defamed plaintiffs when Tuck republished the memorandum (Counts III and IV); and E'ola breached its distributorship…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinesoft Development Corp. v. Softbank Holdings Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API