Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship of Larson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 14, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John B. Riordan, S.

This is an application to create a device similar to a supplemental needs trust pursuant to section 13.29 of the Mental Hygiene Law. The petitioners, A. William Larson and Barbara Peters, are coguardians of their developmentally disabled son, David. David resides at the Sara Daley State Operated Individualized Residential Alternative which is a residence under the jurisdiction of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD). He is under the age of 65 and receives both Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camardella v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. DiGennaro v. Community Hospital of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re GoldblattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1994
  4. In re Patrick BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re DalyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API