Legal Opinion

Newman v. Manning

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— On the 20th day of August, 1874, the appellant, Clinton V. Newman, executed his promissory note to one James A. Hurst, for the sum of $800, payable on the 25th day of December, 1875. Afterwards, and before maturity, this note was assigned by Hurst to the firm of Patrick & Manning, and this was an action by Charles H. Manning, as surviving partner of that firm, against Newman, on the note.

The defendant answered in three paragraphs:

1. That the defendant had, before notice of the assignment of the note, fully paid the same by the payment and discharge of certain judgments taken against him as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daggett v. FlanaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Sharts v. AwaltIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newman v. ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. McDowell, Pyle & Co. v. HopfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Peterson v. Kingman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API