Legal Opinion

Ebert v. Incorporated Village of Garden City

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

This motion to dismiss the complaint turns on whether a municipal parking field is a “ street, highway, bridge, culvert, sidewalk or crosswalk within the meaning *608of section 341-a of the Village Law. Plaintiff alleges that her injury was caused by falling in “a dirt obscured, iced-over hole and depression ” in a parking field maintained by defendant village and that the village had actual and constructive notice of the hole and failed to repair it. She does not plead the written notice that section 341-a requires (Skelly v. Village of Port Chester, 6 A D 2d 717).

While section 341-a is in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. County of WestchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Matter of Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Mullen v. FayetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. People v. KraushaarNassau County District Court · 1949
  5. Weinstein v. McKenzieNew York Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. JensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. People v. BaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Ebert v. INC. VIL. OF GARDEN CITYSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API