Legal Opinion
McKenna v. Edgell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2010No. 08-2080, 08-2393PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Gibson, J.,
ROGERS, J. (pp. 446-51), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Scott E. McKenna (“McKenna”) brought suit against two Royal Oak police officers *435(“the defendants” or “the officers”) who responded to a 911 report that McKenna was having a medical seizure and who thereafter allegedly violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The district court rejected the officers’ argument for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and they sought interlocutory appeal. We dismissed the appeal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the officers’ arguments…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Laurie Range v. Kenneth DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Bazzi v. City of DearbornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Robert Shreve v. Franklin Cnty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Coble v. City of White House, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.