Legal Opinion
Public Utilities Commission of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 31, 1994No. Nos. 92-1647, 93-1493PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, two state agencies authorized to represent the interests of residential consumers, assert that FERC acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it approved funding *278mechanisms for the Gas Research Institute that allegedly unduly discriminate against those consumers. We deny the petitions for review.
I
Most interstate natural gas pipelines are members of the Gas Research Institute (GRI), a scientific nonprofit corporation that administers a comprehensive gaseous fuels research program. The Commission…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Public Citizen, Inc., Aviation Consumer Action Project, and Families of Pan-Am 103/lockerbie v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Vermont Department of Public Service v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vermont Electric Power Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Wpl Holdings, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Office of the Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Indiana Gas Company, Inc. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Trunkline Gas Company Algonquin Gas Transmission Company Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation Associated Gas Distributors Citizens Gas & Coke Utility Public Service Electric & Gas Company Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Union Light, Heat and Power Company Lawrenceburg Gas Company Southern California Gas Company Washington Gas Light Company American Gas Association Columbia Gas Transmission Companies Gas Research Institute Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Mitchell Energy Corporation Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America Process Gas Consumers Group American Iron and Steel Institute Georgia Industrial Group Alabama Gas Corporation Bay State Gas Company Philadelphia Gas Works Williams Natural Gas Company Anr Pipeline Company Colorado Interstate Gas Company Conoco Inc. Marathon Oil Company Wisconsin Distributor Group Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company Pacific Gas Transmission Company, Intervenors. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Office of the Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Conoco Inc. Indiana Gas Company, Inc. Southern California Gas Company Gas Research Institute Northern Natural Gas Company Florida Gas Transmission Company Transwestern Pipeline Company Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America Western Resources, Inc. Columbia Gas Transmission Companies Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation Trunkline Gas Company Algonquin Gas Transmission Company Anr Pipeline Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Colorado Interstate Gas Company American Gas Association Brooklyn Union Gas Company Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Union Light, Heat and Power Company Lawrenceburg Gas Company Process Gas Consumers Group American Iron and Steel Institute Georgia Industrial Group United Distribution Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Bautista v. Juul Labs, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020