Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barrett v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

&emdash;This is an original proceeding in quo warrmto to determine the authority of a national bank engaged in business in the city of St. Louis to establish and conduct a branch bank at another than, its regular place of business in said city.

I. A national bank is an artificial legal entity, created to facilitate the transaction of fiscal affairs under the authority of the laws of the United States. Like other corporations, it possesses such powers as are granted to it by the act of its creation, or more comprehensively stated, whitíh lxave been or may be conferred upon it by Congress within…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Cooper v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Rathjen v. Reorganized School District R-IISupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. State Ex Inf. Miller v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. KoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API