Legal Opinion

Madigan v. City of Onalaska

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

“The practice of resorting to motions for summary judgment came into being to prevent delay in the entry of a judgment due to the interposition of unfounded, false, or frivolous answers.” McLoughlin v. Malnar (1941), 237 Wis. 492, 495, 297 N. W. 370. In the case at bar the answer of the respondent merely stated a conclusion that the La Crosse County Record did not have sufficient circulation to enable it to qualify as the official newspaper of Onalaska. However, appellant’s remedy was not a motion for summary judgment; it was one to make more definite and certain. The procedure provided by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLoughlin v. MalnarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Schau v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People ex rel. O'Connell v. ReadIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  5. Drainage District No. 9 v. Merchants' & Planters' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Sun Co. v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Allen v. Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API