Legal Opinion

Gunckel v. Gunckel

Montgomery County Probate Court

Decided August 10, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WISEMAN, J.

This is an action to "onstrue the last will and testament of Caroline H. Lowe, deceased. The particular portion of the will which requires construction is as follows:

Item -5:. “All the balance of my estate, real, personal or mixed, I hereby will, devise and bequeath to my sons, Charles H. Lowe and John Lowe, m trust, for the following purposes:

“My said trustees shall take possesr sion of all of said oalanoe of my estate and after paying the necessary expenses of said, trust, .shall first out of the proceeds of same, give to my sister, Emma H. Jackson, the sum of Five…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Shepard v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Eberly's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. New Haven Bank, N. B. A. v. HubingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carr v. StradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lloyd v. CampbellCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API