Legal Opinion

Halfpap v. Gruis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 17, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, J. —

The defendant Herman Gruis is alleged to be the owner of an automobile driven by Bennie Gruis, which collided with the buggy of the plaintiff on a public highway leading south from the town of Meservey, Iowa. A complete cause of action is stated against Bennie Gruis, but the only allegation made in the petition with reference to Herman Gruis is the following: That an automobile belonging to the defendant Herman Gruis was being driven by the defendant Bennie Gruis, etc. Judgment is asked against both defendants for the sum of $5,000.

This accident occurred on the 16th day of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Meeker v. MeekerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Curry v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Knight v. Moline, East Moline & Watertown Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Landry v. OversenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Hofacre v. City of MonticelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seleine v. WisnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Lange v. BedellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Bridges v. WelzienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Enfield v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Tigue Sales Co. v. Reliance Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API