Legal Opinion

Seleine v. Wisner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

To the petition of plaintiff the defendant interposed two challenges: (1) by motion to strike certain allegations, and (2) by a demurrer. From the rulings adverse to plaintiff, this appeal is taken.

The pleaded facts pertinent and material on the consideration of this cause are as follows:

“That, on July 2 and 3, 1921, the plaintiff was a passenger in a certain automobile owned by the defendant, Gilman H. Wisner, and then being driven and operated solely by Carroll Crockett, a half brother of Gilman H. Wisner, who was using and operating the said automobile by and with the consent of the owner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maine v. James Maine & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Curry v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Stapleton v. Independent Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Rowland v. SpaltiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Wolf v. SulikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Heavilin v. WendellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Krausnick v. Haegg Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Lange v. BedellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Sexton v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API