Legal Opinion
Oedekerk v. Muncie Gear Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 16, 1950No. 9917_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case was simple. The basic facts are undisputed. Plaintiffs sued defendant to recover freight charges and for handling and packing costs in making two shipments of rocket tubes from California to Muncie, Indiana, and back to Pasadena, on the ground that defendatit had breached a contract for the purchase of the tubes. That is, plaintiffs were forced to reship the tubes to their plant in California because defendant would not accept the shipments. No question was raised as. to the freight costs on the shipments or the packing and crating costs in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Shapiro v. RubensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Fox River Paper Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Stallman v. GosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Maier v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Suyemasa v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Systems Incorporated, a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Bridge Electronics Company, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Interstate Industries, Inc. v. Barclay Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- William J. Wineberg v. Raymond P. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.