Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Gabor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 30, 2014No. 12-4004, 12-4051PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J., joined by Griffin, J.,
MERRITT, J. (pp. 632-33), delivered a separate dissenting opinion as to that part.
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
In the aggregate, a jury convicted two Cuyahoga County officials, James Dimora and Michael Gabor, of 39 violations of federal anti-corruption laws stemming from their participation in a slate of bribery and fraud schemes involving various Cleveland-area favor-seekers. Expensive trips to Las Vegas in exchange for county patronage, thousands of dollars in cash in exchange for government jobs, extensive home improvements to the tune of $30,000 in exchange for public construction…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Gerald DaneshvarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Vinesh DarjiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- James Dimora v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Maurice Duncan BurksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.