Building Material & Construction Teamsters' Union v. Farrell
California Supreme Court
1DissentLucas, J.
I respectfully dissent. The majority hold that the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) requires local public agencies to “meet and confer” with representatives of the recognized employee bargaining unit before eliminating employment positions in that unit and reassigning the duties of *669those positions to employees outside the unit. In my view, the MMBA is inapplicable to such managerial decisions, and I fear that imposing the act’s requirements in such situations will unduly burden the day-to-day operation of state and local governmental entities.
The correct analysis was set forth in the opinion of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Seal Beach Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Seal BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Berkeley Police Assn. v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.