Worrell v. Sachs

This case presents a novel question: Is a pet animal a “product” under Connecticut’s product liability law, General Statutes § 52-572m et seq.?

The complaint alleges serious eye damage and loss of sight by a child resulting from exposure to a diseased, parasite-carrying puppy purchased by the child’s mother from the defendant’s pet shop. The defendant moves to strike, arguing that a dog is not a product within the meaning of § 52-572 et seq. of the General Statutes.

“Product” is not defined by that law. Nor are there relevant Connecticut cases. Other jurisdictions which considered the issue…