Legal Opinion
Vogel v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 29, 2000No. Claim No. 101994-APublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Philip J. Patti, J.
Defendant moved to dismiss this action for alleged defamation on the grounds that the claim was untimely and that an absolute privilege for quasi-judicial communications shields it from liability for the statements at issue. Claimant responded that her claim was timely because a coclaimant served a notice of intention within 90 days after the claim accrued. She also argued that no privilege attached to the communications because they were made in a proceeding to which she was not a party. In a cross motion, she sought an order compelling defendant to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- McGill v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Jones v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Allan & Allan Arts Ltd. v. RosenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lepkowski v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kocontes v. McQuaidNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Milner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp.New York Court of Claims · 2004
- Graham v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Turner v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2003