State ex rel. Spillman v. Federated Merchants Mutual Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action in quo warranto, instituted by the attorney general, in the name of the state, to oust the defendant from exercising in this state powers, which it claims, of writing certain kinds of insurance. To the petition defendant interposed a demurrer, which was sustained. Relator elected to stand upon his petition, and the action was dismissed. Relator has appealed.
In the petition it is alleged that the respondent is a mutual insurance company, organized under and by virtue of the laws of the state in conformity with chapter 45,-Laws 1897, and acts amendatory thereto, and that it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McIntosh v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. City Water Co. v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Sharpe v. Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United WorkmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Commercial Bank v. Eastern Banking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- War Finance Corp. v. ThorntonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Bliss v. ReddingNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Traders Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955