Legal Opinion

McLaws v. Kruger

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1981No. 15327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

This appeal is taken from a denial of defendant-appellant Kruger’s motion to quash a writ of garnishment in the Superior Court of Navajo County. Taking jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. Const. Art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., we affirm.

Appellant presents two issues for our determination: whether cash proceeds from the voluntary sale of a homestead are exempt from garnishment by seller’s judgment creditor when the seller intends to reinvest the proceeds in a new homestead at the time of the sale of the original homesteaded property;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Snell v. McCartyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mack v. BootsArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. White v. Brown (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Winter v. Glaze (In Re Glaze)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  4. Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Evans v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API