McLaws v. Kruger
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Justice:
This appeal is taken from a denial of defendant-appellant Kruger’s motion to quash a writ of garnishment in the Superior Court of Navajo County. Taking jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. Const. Art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., we affirm.
Appellant presents two issues for our determination: whether cash proceeds from the voluntary sale of a homestead are exempt from garnishment by seller’s judgment creditor when the seller intends to reinvest the proceeds in a new homestead at the time of the sale of the original homesteaded property;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Thomas v. Western Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Snell v. McCartyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Mack v. BootsArizona Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- White v. Brown (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Winter v. Glaze (In Re Glaze)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
- Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Evans v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.