Legal Opinion

M. H. Rhodes, Inc. v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The appellant contends that the defendant city had no constitutional or statutory authority to enact an ordinance imposing a charge for parking in the streets. The appellees contend that the city does have such power under the following statutes: C. S., 2787 (11), authorizing municipalities “to adopt such ordinances for the regulation and use of the streets as it may deem best for the public welfare of the citizens of the city; C. S., 2787 (31), authorizing municipalities “to provide for the regulation, diversion, and limitation of vehicular traffic on public streets and highways” for public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. . BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Almand v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Foster's, Inc. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Kimmel v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cassidy v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  5. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API