Legal Opinion

Pichardo v. New York City Department of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff failed to establish that defendants’ conduct contributed to her delay in commencing this action and that therefore defendants should be estopped from asserting the defense of the one-year statute of limitations applicable to her non-tort claims of gender and disability discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, and breach of contract (see Nowinski v City of New York, 189 AD2d 674 [1st Dept 1993]). Moreover, she failed to establish due diligence on her part in ascertaining the limitations period for commencing the action (see Walker v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 36 AD3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dana v. Oak Park Marina, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Nowinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Walker v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Jarvis v. Nation of IslamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.A. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API