Legal Opinion
United States Hoffman Machinery Corp. v. Ebenstein
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 9, 1939No. 34,412PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allen, J.:
The action is one in replevin for the return of certain machinery and equipment sold under the terms of an order and conditional sales contract dated November 3, 1934.
The machinery was described in the contract:
“Three (3) Hoffman Amico stretchers 54 x 180 less unit heaters, but with pipe coils and present rods and bars, Reference 15040, 15041, 15042.
“Two (2) 30x48 Vorclone low front motor driven by Dry Clng. Washers $2,265 and return of
“One Vorclone 30x48 U Shape D. C. washer motor belted, complete with motor and belts and starter and one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. RisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Clement v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Oliver Farm Equipment Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- General Refrigeration Sales Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- J. W. Jenkins Sons' Music Co. v. StehleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sharfarz v. Goguen (In Re Goguen)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Streeks, Inc. v. Diamond Hill Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Mynatt v. CollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Herl v. State Bank of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Salina Coca-Cola Bottling Corp. v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.