Legal Opinion

United States v. Small

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 18, 1969No. Crim. A. 68-289PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMOEANDUM OF DECISION AND OEDEE

FEANK J. MUEEAY, District Judge.

This case, an indictment charging defendant Eichard J. Small with violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a) (l), 1 came on to be heard on defendant’s motion under Eule 41(e) (1) (Fed.E.Crim.P.) to suppress the contents of a locker seized without a warrant by one Gruden, a special agent of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. Defendant also moved for a ruling to exclude from evidence statements made by him to Gruden.

After a hearing, the court found facts which, for the purpose of these motions, may be summarized as follows.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Guthrie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. United States v. Rafael SorianoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API