Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Hadden

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of DeKalb county; the Hon. Theodore D. Murphy, Judge, presiding. This was an action of replevin, brought at the September term, 1863, by Cyrus H. McCormick & Co., against George M. Hadden, to recover possession of two horses. The defendant below had a verdict and judgment. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

In Uovember, 1861, the plaintiffs in error, by their agent, Champlin, sold to Gilbert Hadden and Lewis C. Hadden, a reaper, a grain drill and some wheat in* store. The purchasers gave their notes for the purchase money, secured by a chattel mortgage on two horses in the possession of Gilbert Hadden. Soon after this transaction, George M. Hadden, the defendant, came to the house of Gilbert, and took away the horses. Thereupon the plaintiffs brought their action of replevin, and the verdict and judgment being against them in the Circuit Court, they have brought the record here.

It appeared on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ketchum v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. Mallory, Son & Zimmerman Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. In re RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  5. Jones v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API