Legal Opinion

Young v. Hatch

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 17, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On report. Judgment for plaintiffs. The case sufficiently appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.

Trespass by mortgagees against mortgagor for taking and removing from the mortgaged premises a hot water heating apparatus consisting of a heater, radiators and piping, and a copper hot water tank and fixtures. The defendant mortgaged his dwelling house and the land on which it stood to the plaintiffs, April 8, 1902. At that time all the property mentioned had been set up by the owner and was in use in the house. The heater was set on the cellar *466bottom, and was connected by pipes running through the floor with radiators on the first floor, and by pipes running up in the partitions with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Short & Co. v. Trabue & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roseburg Nat. Bank v. CampOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  3. Warrington v. HignuttSuperior Court of Delaware · 1943
  4. Cumberland County Power & Light Co. v. Hotel AmbassadorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API